THE PROBLEM OF METHODOLOGY IN IBN RUSHD’S HERMENEUTIC

Volume: 10 Number: 3 December 31, 2010
  • Hasan Ocak
EN TR

THE PROBLEM OF METHODOLOGY IN IBN RUSHD’S HERMENEUTIC

Abstract

I think that it would not be too assertive to claim that hermeneutic activity underlies almost every movement in the Muslim world, be it political, intellectual, or social. The fact that a text that has been interpreted differently from other texts underlies many currents that have arisen in Islamic history evidences this claim. Therefore, the Muslim thinkers who have come to realize this fact have from the early years onwards tried to develop theories to explain the nature of this hermeneutic activity. Ibn Rushd is no doubt one of the thinkers who wrote on this subject. He approached the issue from his own perspective and laid down some necessary principles regarding the allegorical interpretation of the Scripture, developing a special methodology about the questions, “Which religious texts can be interpreted allegorically? What is the procedure of this work? Who can perform this work? Where and how the allegorical interpretations will be used?” In the light of this methodology, Ibn Rushd criticized various conceptions of hermeneutics, giving examples of allegorical interpretations to establish the validity of his own hermeneutical method.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Hasan Ocak

Publication Date

December 31, 2010

Submission Date

January 1, 2010

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2010 Volume: 10 Number: 3

APA
Ocak, H. (2010). İBN RÜŞD’ÜN TE’VİL ANLAYIŞINDA METODOLOJİ SORUNU. Marife Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(3), 171-198. https://izlik.org/JA54CX28RJ
AMA
1.Ocak H. İBN RÜŞD’ÜN TE’VİL ANLAYIŞINDA METODOLOJİ SORUNU. Marife. 2010;10(3):171-198. https://izlik.org/JA54CX28RJ
Chicago
Ocak, Hasan. 2010. “İBN RÜŞD’ÜN TE’VİL ANLAYIŞINDA METODOLOJİ SORUNU”. Marife Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi 10 (3): 171-98. https://izlik.org/JA54CX28RJ.
EndNote
Ocak H (December 1, 2010) İBN RÜŞD’ÜN TE’VİL ANLAYIŞINDA METODOLOJİ SORUNU. Marife Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi 10 3 171–198.
IEEE
[1]H. Ocak, “İBN RÜŞD’ÜN TE’VİL ANLAYIŞINDA METODOLOJİ SORUNU”, Marife, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 171–198, Dec. 2010, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA54CX28RJ
ISNAD
Ocak, Hasan. “İBN RÜŞD’ÜN TE’VİL ANLAYIŞINDA METODOLOJİ SORUNU”. Marife Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi 10/3 (December 1, 2010): 171-198. https://izlik.org/JA54CX28RJ.
JAMA
1.Ocak H. İBN RÜŞD’ÜN TE’VİL ANLAYIŞINDA METODOLOJİ SORUNU. Marife. 2010;10:171–198.
MLA
Ocak, Hasan. “İBN RÜŞD’ÜN TE’VİL ANLAYIŞINDA METODOLOJİ SORUNU”. Marife Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi, vol. 10, no. 3, Dec. 2010, pp. 171-98, https://izlik.org/JA54CX28RJ.
Vancouver
1.Hasan Ocak. İBN RÜŞD’ÜN TE’VİL ANLAYIŞINDA METODOLOJİ SORUNU. Marife [Internet]. 2010 Dec. 1;10(3):171-98. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA54CX28RJ