KURAN'DA EKSİKLİK OLDUGU İDDİALAR! BAGLAMINDA BAZI SURELERLE İLGİLi RİVAYETLER ÜZERİNE BİR DEGERLENDİRME (Ahzab, Muavvizeteyn, Kunut ve Nurayn Rivayetleri)

İslam dininin temel bilgi ve dü§ünce kaynağının odak noktasında Kur'an bulunmaktadır. Onun bu özelliği, Hz. Peygamber döneminde olduğu gibi, sonraki asırlarda da devam edegelmi§tir. Ancak Peygamberden sonraki halifeler döneminde ba§layan siyasi, mezhebi ekolle§meler açısından Kur'an, aynı zamanda siyasi, mezhebi ve fıkhi iddiaların da ispatı için müracaat edilen temel referans olmu§tur. İslam adına ortaya çıkan her ekol, görü§lerini benimsetebilmek ve kendine me§ruiyet zemini olu§turmak için, iddialarını ayetlere dayandırmaya özen göstermi§lerdir. 

In the Sunnite Hadith Compilations, there are same reports about the $urahs of Ahzab, Muawwizatayn and Qunut. These reports daim that the Surah of Ahzab was in fad as lengthy as the Surah of al-Baqara, that the Muawwizatayn did not exist in the Copy of ıbn Mas'ud, that the two Qunuts existed as the Chapters of the Qur'an in the eapy of Ubay. Relying on such reports, it has been claimed that there occured distortion on the Qur'an. However, none of these reports include the words of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) who is the only authority in this issue. it is through the concensus of the Prophet's campanians which came down to us by tawatur that something is part of the Qur'an or not. All of the reports on this issue are exclusively al·khabar al·wahid. The problem is not more than the misunderstanding of same companions stemming from the fad that the Prophet recited the Muawwizatayn to shield his grandsons against the evil of Satan and that the Qunuts were recited as prayer though they were not in fad chapters of the Qur'an. The claim voiced by some Shi'ites that there existed a Surah called "Noorayn" in the Qur'an was alsa rejeded by the majority of the Shi'ites. As the text of a typical Shi'ite propaganda, this apocryphal Surah is not conSidered by Nöldeke and Schwally to be an authentic Qur'anic chapterı either.