Çocuklar ‘Sezgisel Tanrıcı’mıdır? Doğada Amaç ve Tasarım Hakkında Akıl Yürütme

Deborah Kelemen

doi:10.33420/marife.1037647

TR EN

Çocuklar ‘Sezgisel Tanrıcı’mıdır? Doğada Amaç ve Tasarım Hakkında Akıl Yürütme

Öz

Farklı araştırma grupları, küçük çocukların amaç bakımından doğal olaylar hakkında akıl yürütmeye yönelik engin bir eğilime sahip olduklarını ve doğal varlıkların kökenlerini bilinç-bazlı açıklama usulüne doğru bir yönelime sahip olduklarını göstermektedir. Bu makale, bilişsel-gelişim araştırmalarının çeşitli alanlarından elde edilen son bulguları bir araya getirerek, aşağıdaki soruyu ele almak için, bu sonuçları daha da derinlemesine incelemektedir. Çocuklar, Piaget’çi terimlerle ‘yapaycı’ olmaktan ziyade, doğal olayları insan dışı bir tasarımın eseri olarak düşünme eğiliminde midirle-r? Çocukların etken algısı, hayali arkadaşlar ve eşyayı kavrama algıları üzerine yapılan bir araştırma incelemesi, onların bu kavramlara getirdikleri tanımların yaklaşık 5 yaşına geldiklerinde açıklayıcı bir değeri ve pratiğe uyumluluğunun olabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Atran, S. “Causal Constraints on Categories”. Causal Cognition: A Multi-Disciplinary Debate. ed. D. at all Premack. 263-265. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
Atran, Scott. In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. USA: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Baillargeon, R. “The Object Concept Revisited: New Directions in the Investigation of Infants’ Physical Knowledge”. Visual perception and cognition in infancy. ed. C.E. Granrud. 265-315. NJ: Erlbaum, 1993.
Barrett, J. L. vd. “God’s Beliefs Versus Mother’s: The Development of Nonhuman Agent Concepts”. Child Development 72/1 (Şubat 2001), 50-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00265
Barrett, Justin L. “Exploring the Natural Foundations of Religion”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4/1 (Ocak 2000), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01419-9
Bering, Jesse. “Intuitive Conceptions of Dead Agents’ Minds: The Natural Foundations of Afterlife Beliefs as Phenomenological Boundary”. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2/4 (01 Ocak 2002), 263-308. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685370260441008
Boyer, Pascal. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic books, 2001.
Carey, Susan. Conceptual Change in Childhood. MA: MIT press, 1985.

Casler, K. - Kelemen, D. “Teleological Explanations of Nature Among Romanian Roma (gypsy) Adults”. Unpublished Manuscript.
Casler, K. - Kelemen, D. “Tool Use and Children’s Understanding of Artifact Function”. Unpublished Manuscript.
Chandler, M. vd. “Small-Scale Deceit - Deception as a Marker of 2-Year-Old, 3-Year-Old, and 4-Year-Olds Early Theories of Mind”. Child Development 60/6 (1989), 1263-1277. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130919
Csibra, Gergely - Gergely, György. “The Teleological Origins of Mentalistic Action Explanations: A Developmental Hypothesis”. Developmental Science 1/2 (1998), 255-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00039
Defeyter, Margaret Anne - German, Tim P. “Acquiring an Understanding of Design: Evidence from Children’s Insight Problem Solving”. Cognition 89/2 (2003), 133-155.
Diesendruck, Gil vd. “Children’s Reliance on Creator’s Intent in Extending Names for Artifacts”. Psychological Science 14/2 (Mart 2003), 164-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01436
Evans, E. - Mull, M. “Magic Can Happen in That World (but Not This One): Constructing a Naïve Metaphysics”. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Evans, E. M. “Cognitive and Contextual Factors in the Emergence of Diverse Belief Systems: Creation Versus Evolution”. Cognitive Psychology 42/3 (Mayıs 2001), 217-266. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0749
Evans, E. Margaret. “Beyond Scopes: Why Creationism Is Here to Stay”. Imagining the Impossible: Magical, Scientific, and Religious Thinking in Children. ed. Carl N. John-son vd. 305-333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571381.012
Evans, E Margaret. “The Emergence of Beliefs About the Origins of Species in School-Age Children”. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-), 221-254.
Gelman, S. - Kremer, K. “Understanding Natural Cause - Childrens Explanations of How Objects and Their Properties Originate”. Child Development 62/2 (Nisan 1991), 396-414. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131012
Gentner, Dedre. “What Looks Like a Jiggy but Acts Like a Zimbo?: A Study of Early Word Meaning Using Artificial Objects”. Papers and Reports on Child Language Develop-ment 15/ (1978), 1-6.
German, T. P. - Defeyter, M. A. “Immunity to Functional Fixedness in Young Children”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7/4 (Aralık 2000), 707-712. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213010
German, Tim P. - Johnson, Susan C. “Function and the Origins of the Design Stance”. Journal of Cognition and Development 3/3 (Ağustos 2002), 279-300. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD0303_2
Graham, Susan A vd. “Preschoolers’ and Adults’ Reliance on Object Shape and Object Function for Lexical Extension”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 74/2 (1999), 128-151.
Guthrie, S. “Animal Animism: Evolutionary Roots of Religious Cognition, Current Approaches in the Cognitive Science of Religion”. Continuum.
Harris, Paul L. “On Not Falling Down to Earth: Children’s Metaphysical Questions”. Imagining the Impossible: Magical, Scientific, and Religious Thinking in Children. ed. Carl N.
Johnson vd. 157-178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571381.007
Johnson, Carl N. “Putting Different Things Together: The Development of Metaphysical Thinking”. Imagining the Impossible: Magical, Scientific, and Religious Thinking in Children. ed. Carl N. Johnson vd. 179-211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571381.008
Johnson, Susan C vd. “Inferring the Goals of a Nonhuman Agent”. Cognitive Development 16/1 (01 Ocak 2001), 637-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(01)00043-0
Keil, Frank C. Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge: mit Press, 1989.
Keil, Frank C. “The Origins of an Autonomous Biology”. Modularity and Constraints in Language and Cognition. ed. M.R. Gunnar. 103-137. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1992.
Kelemen, D. “Beliefs About Purpose: On the Origins of Teleological Thought”. The Descent of Mind: Psychological Perspectives on Hominid Evolution. ed. M. Corballis. 278-294. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Kelemen, D. “Intention in Children’s Understanding of Artifact Function”, 2001.
Kelemen, D. “Why Are Rocks Pointy? Children’s Preference for Teleological Explanations of the Natural World”. Developmental Psychology 35/6 (Kasım 1999), 1440-1452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.6.1440
Kelemen, D. - Carey, S. “The Essence of Artifacts: Developing the Design Stance”. The essence of artifacts: Developing the design stance. ed. S. Laurence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Kelemen, Deborah. “British and American Children’s Preferences for Teleo-Functional Explanations of the Natural World”. Cognition 88/2 (2003), 201-221.
Kelemen, Deborah vd. “Teleo‐Functional Constraints on Preschool Children’s Reasoning About Living Things”. Developmental Science 6/3 (2003), 329-345.
Kelemen, Deborah. “The Scope of Teleological Thinking in Preschool Children”. Cognition 70/3 (Nisan 1999), 241-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00010-4
Kelemen, Deborah vd. “Why Things Happen: Teleological Explanation in Parent-Child Conversations.” Developmental Psychology 41/1 (2005), 251.
Kelemen, Deborah - DiYanni, Cara. “Intuitions About Origins: Purpose and Intelligent Design in Children’s Reasoning About Nature”. Journal of Cognition and Development 6/1 (2005), 3-31.
Knight, Nicola vd. “Children’s Attributions of Beliefs to Humans and God: Cross‐Cultural Evidence”. Cognitive Science 28/1 (2004), 117-126.
Landau, B. vd. “Object Shape, Object Function, and Object Name”. Journal of Memory and Language 38/1 (Ocak 1998), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2533
Markson, LM. “Developing Understanding of Artifact Function”, 2001.
Matan, Adee - Carey, Susan. “Developmental Changes Within the Core of Artifact Concepts”. Cognition 78/1 (2001), 1-26.
Mead, Margaret. “An Investigation of the Thought of Primitive Children, with Special Reference to Animism”. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 62/ (1932), 173-190.
Nelson, D. G. K. vd. “Two-Year-Olds Will Name Artifacts by Their Functions”. Child Development 71/5 (Ekim 2000), 1271-1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00228
Nelson, D. G. K. vd. “Young Children’s Use of Functional Information to Categorize Artifacts: Three Factors That Matter”. Cognition 77/2 (16 Kasım 2000), 133-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00097-4
Petrovich, Olivera. “Understanding of Non-Natural Causality in Children and Adults: A Case Against Artificialism”. Psyche en Geloof 8/ (1997), 151-165.
Piaget, Jean. “The Child’s Concept of the World”. Londres, Routldge & Kegan Paul.
Rips, Lance J . “Similarity, Typicality, and Categorization”. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. ed. Andrew Ortony - Stella Vosniadou. 21-59. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863.004
Siegal, M. - Beattie, K. “Where to Look 1st for Childrens Knowledge of False Beliefs”. Cognition 38/1 (Ocak 1991), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90020-5
Springer, K - Keil, FC. “On the Development of Biologically Specific Beliefs - the Case of Inheritance”. Child Development 60/3 (1989), 637-648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1989.tb02744.x
Taylor, Marjorie. Imaginary Companions and the Children Who Create Them. Oxford University Press on Demand, 1999.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Din Araştırmaları

Bölüm

Çeviri

Yazarlar

Deborah Kelemen
United States

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Aralık 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Aralık 2021

Kabul Tarihi

26 Aralık 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.33420/marife.1037647

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA33JZ75HY

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

ISNAD

Kelemen, Deborah. “Çocuklar ‘Sezgisel Tanrıcı’mıdır? Doğada Amaç ve Tasarım Hakkında Akıl Yürütme”. Marife Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi. Trc. Osman Zahid Çifçi 21/2 (01 Aralık 2021): 1291-1309. https://doi.org/10.33420/marife.1037647.

Çocuklar ‘Sezgisel Tanrıcı’mıdır? Doğada Amaç ve Tasarım Hakkında Akıl Yürütme

Çocuklar ‘Sezgisel Tanrıcı’mıdır? Doğada Amaç ve Tasarım Hakkında Akıl Yürütme

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Are Children ‘‘Intuitive Theists’’? Reasoning About Purpose and Design in Nature

Abstract

Keywords

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster